A cost of living comparison using tax-adjusted purchasing power data.
San Francisco has the highest cost of living index in our dataset at 194 — even above NYC's 187. Combine that with California's income tax (about 7% effective rate at a $70k income, higher at larger salaries), and Austin becomes one of the most financially dramatic moves you can make. On a $90,000 salary, keeping that income in Austin gives you the purchasing power of roughly $155,000 in San Francisco — a 72% increase. At higher tech salaries the gap grows further, because California's marginal tax rate climbs steeply.
| Category | San Francisco | Austin | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall COL Index | 194 | 121 | −38% |
| Median 1BR Rent | ~$3,400/mo | ~$1,700/mo | −50% |
| State Income Tax | 7.0% | 0% | −7.0 pp |
At $60,000: your purchasing power in Austin is equivalent to earning about $103,000 in San Francisco. At $90,000: equivalent to roughly $155,000 in SF. And this is where the SF→Austin move gets particularly pointed for tech workers: if you're earning $150,000 or $200,000 in SF, the tax gap widens considerably. California's top marginal rate is 13.3%, and even at $150k a single filer is already in the 9.3% bracket. Texas has none of that. The COL difference is the same at any income level; the tax savings scale with income.
The one genuine caveat: many SF tech salaries include equity that's tied to Bay Area company valuations. If you're exercising RSUs or options from a company with a strong SF presence, some of that value is place-specific — moving doesn't eliminate the tax exposure on grants that already vested in California.
Remote tech workers who can keep SF-level salaries while living in Austin are the clearest winners. The financial case is almost hard to argue with — unless you have specific career reasons to stay in the Bay Area. Austin has attracted enough tech companies (Apple, Tesla, Oracle, Dell, Google, Meta all have significant Austin presence) that even people who need to work locally have real options.
The harder tradeoffs are personal. San Francisco has a density and walkability that Austin doesn't come close to matching. Austin's food and music culture is genuinely good; the weather has real extremes in both directions; and the city is sprawling and car-dependent. If you're making the move to save money but genuinely love SF's lifestyle, the financial gain is real — but so is the adjustment. The people who struggle most with this move are those who underestimated how much they'd miss urban density and public transit.
For tech workers, Austin's local market has become legitimately strong — not Bay Area strong, but not a consolation prize either. Apple's campus employs thousands. Tesla's Gigafactory, Oracle's HQ relocation, and a dense startup ecosystem mean real job options for engineers, product managers, and designers. Salaries at Austin-native companies often run 10-20% below equivalent SF roles, but the COL and tax advantages more than compensate in most cases. If you're remote-first, this point is moot.
Enter your income and compare San Francisco vs Austin. Get your exact tax-adjusted purchasing power in seconds.
Compare SF vs Austin →